No friction dancing.
Student Council Officer 
WARNING: This user may cause brain damage. Limit exposure to reduce your risk.
Posts: 80
|
Post by No friction dancing. on Jan 10, 2006 9:07:37 GMT -5
Alright, let's get this out into the open. The views of the Democratic Party don't make any sense. Think about this for a minute:
1. If somebody is very pessimistic, and don't value life much, they will believe in the death penalty and abortion.
2. If somebody values the sanctity of life, they will be against the death penalty and abortion.
3. If you are a Republican, you're against abortion but for the death penalty. The logic is that an unborn baby isn't guilty of anything, but a murderer is. This is a reasonable argument. By committing the crime, you gave up your right to live. It's like the implied consent law. If you are driving drunk, the police can ask you to take a breathalizer test, and if you refuse, they can revoke your license. If you don't like that, then you shouldn't drive drunk. It is an effective deterrant for drunk driving, just like the death penalty is an effective deterrant for murder. You're welcome to challenge it, but the facts are on my side.
4. If you're a Democrat, you are against the death penalty but for abortion. How does that work? Are they just playing devil's advocate, so they can oppose the Republicans? You must have to be pretty good at mental gymnastics to be a Democrat.
5. Statistics show that people tend to vote Republican as they get older. So there are more younger Democrats, and as they age they become Republicans. It sounds to me that the Democratic party is the party of people that are immature and whiny, and they think that volunteering at a soup kitchen or buying a cd is going to save the world. Then they finally see the light, and vote for the GOP.
Congrats to the Democratic Party, since they're the second group to be added to my nailed board.
And congrats to my karma, which will probably be negative pretty soon.
|
|
Shep
Full Member
Student Advisory Council
Best thing ever...
Posts: 28
|
Post by Shep on Jan 10, 2006 13:41:59 GMT -5
With age comes wisdom. As well as retirement, even higher healthcare costs, and senility. The younger people in the nation want to see a better future, so they vote democrat. The older people want tax cuts so they dont have to pay to take money from their retirement accounts. I'm not saying the republican party is entirely full of morons and rich elitist social-darwinist businessmen. I'm saying that the democrats aren't the whiny, immature ones here.
The GOP whines about how the grand total of 5 democrats in congress today are at fault in the national government's failure to balance the budget. All the democrats can do nowadays is voice dissent, they have no power in government. But the republicans aren't mature enough to put the good of their constituants over the massive monetary donations from lobbyists and actually get off their collective [Admin! Please ban me for my foul mouth!]es and get something done for the good of the country.
The democrats have the maturity to set aside their own personal interests and try to better the country. They push for reforms and programs that will help the people of this country. Not everything they do is right. But at least they've got the [Admin! Please ban me for my foul mouth!] to try, while the republicans decide to screw the future for their own personal gain.
|
|
No friction dancing.
Student Council Officer
WARNING: This user may cause brain damage. Limit exposure to reduce your risk.
Posts: 80
|
Post by No friction dancing. on Jan 10, 2006 13:53:40 GMT -5
Excuse me, but last time I checked young people in this day and age are the most selfish of all the generations of America (don't check that fact, but it might be true.) The only reason people in our generation do any charitable work is so they can put it on their college resume. The fact (by which I mean baseless conjecture) is that the older generations care the most about America. How many of us (by which I don't include myself) have said that as soon as any war starts, we're moving to Canada? The young people of America want to see a better future for themselves. They want all of the world's problems to be able to be solved by buying Live Aid cd's and putting "God Bless America" bumperstickers on their cars. Democrats think that you can solve problems by throwing money at them. You say that Republicans only care about personal gain, but what Democrats want is to put their brains on cruise control, so instead of running a country, we can focus on more important things, like whether or not we should jail Ludacris and Sam Houser.
I just nailed you Senator Lieberman. If you have any courage, you'll form a rebuttal.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jesus on Jan 10, 2006 22:41:19 GMT -5
1. critics of ludacris were mostly on the GOP (oreilly, bush etc) zel miller also opposes him but he is in no way a democrat, hes just pretending.
2. this abortion death penalty thing has been done to death. i even had a website highlighting the contradictions of both parties in my profile until i realized how brutally overdone it was. The said site only had one number dedicated to the abortion paradox, and another to the age factor. it also touched upon religion, and about 10 other points. it was also amusing.
3. the canada thing was prolly a shot at me so, i will only go to canada over a bull[Admin! Please ban me for my foul mouth!] war. iraq is a bull[Admin! Please ban me for my foul mouth!] war, vietnam was a bull[Admin! Please ban me for my foul mouth!] war, korea was a bull[Admin! Please ban me for my foul mouth!] war. china will not be and i will nuke beijing and not even demand a salary, the job is rewarding enough.
saying you've nailed something after a few posts of ramble and being served by shep means nothing. go [Admin! Please ban me for my foul mouth!] yourself
|
|
No friction dancing.
Student Council Officer
WARNING: This user may cause brain damage. Limit exposure to reduce your risk.
Posts: 80
|
Post by No friction dancing. on Jan 11, 2006 13:20:08 GMT -5
Come, you are just being racist. Iraq isn't a bull[Admin! Please ban me for my foul mouth!] war. It's a bull[Admin! Please ban me for my foul mouth!] war because Americans are dying in it. When thousands of Iraqis were dying, that was fine with everybody. Saddam killed like 200,000 Iraqis. I guess you just don't value other people's lives. It's hardly a bull[Admin! Please ban me for my foul mouth!] war. Don't anybody start splitting hairs with this either. Maybe there weren't WMD's, but that doesn't mean that there was no justification for going to war. People that don't support the war are basically saying that an American life is more valuable than 5,000 Iraqi lifes.
That means that there is justification for going to war to China, though I think that you might have other motives...
All that being said, the nailed board is staying up. Deal with it. I don't have to verbally (or electronically, as the case may be) nail somebody for them to go on the nailed board. I'm not one to use words. I'm a head buster.
|
|
Shep
Full Member
Student Advisory Council
Best thing ever...
Posts: 28
|
Post by Shep on Jan 16, 2006 21:39:19 GMT -5
Now that that's all taken care of, back on topic.. what was the topic again? Oh yeah, why republicans suck. just look at this to see why we shouldn't let the republicans lead.  Before you point this out, yes, this does show increases in debt, not actual value of debt. The debt was still increasing under the democratic presidents. But this increase was not nearly as dramatic. And yes there was the whole "war" thing, but there was also the whole "tax cut" thing. Just to further emphasize this point (being that republicans are too stupid to balance the nation's checkbook):  If your accountant can't figure out that a period of major economic strain isn't a good time to start up cash giveaways, they should be fired. Period. But, then again, most republicans probably couldn't make it far enough in college to get an associate's degree in brewery mechanics, not to mention an mba or a degree in economics |
|
|
|
Post by Jesus on Jan 16, 2006 23:39:50 GMT -5
Come, you are just being racist. Iraq isn't a bull[Admin! Please ban me for my foul mouth!] war. It's a bull[Admin! Please ban me for my foul mouth!] war because Americans are dying in it. When thousands of Iraqis were dying, that was fine with everybody. Saddam killed like 200,000 Iraqis. I guess you just don't value other people's lives. It's hardly a bull[Admin! Please ban me for my foul mouth!] war. Don't anybody start splitting hairs with this either. Maybe there weren't WMD's, but that doesn't mean that there was no justification for going to war. People that don't support the war are basically saying that an American life is more valuable than 5,000 Iraqi lifes. That means that there is justification for going to war to China, though I think that you might have other motives... All that being said, the nailed board is staying up. Deal with it. I don't have to verbally (or electronically, as the case may be) nail somebody for them to go on the nailed board. I'm not one to use words. I'm a head buster. How am I racist. Do you have any idea of the problems in Africa? George Bush gives aid that is so minimal it is insulting. War Lords and Dictators intercept all the aid we try to send. Children are enslaved, revolutions occur everytime windows crashes. George Bush's reasons for going into Iraq were bull[Admin! Please ban me for my foul mouth!]ted, further investigation will show that but everything is locked down now. The true number of Iraqis killed, unknown but estimated to be in 5 digits. I am a firm believer that if people want to get free they shall. You can't give them freedom. Imagine canada coming down and forcing free health care on us. I'd shoot every canadian in sight. China is a different story, I have family thats Chinese. It has nothing to do with the orientation (no pun intended) of their eyes; it is about their economic practices that are going to make the difference between my grandchildren from being an engineer or a walmart greeter. They are eerily brainwashed (North Korea too if you watched 60 minutes the other day) and I am afraid that that war is inevitable. If we are gonna police the globe we need to 1. do it evenly not just in places we care about at the time 2. do it right with help from the UN and full armor for our troops 3. have a justifiable, legitimate reason for doing it so we can get help from the UN and not have a shameful mark on our country. 4. not torture prisoners. when john mcain is trying to fight his own government's torture methods and the administration is resisting, we have a problem. |
|
No friction dancing.
Student Council Officer
WARNING: This user may cause brain damage. Limit exposure to reduce your risk.
Posts: 80
|
Post by No friction dancing. on Jan 17, 2006 13:39:14 GMT -5
REPLIES:
1. I find it kind of ironic that this is in the "I have a life" board, but whatever.
2. America's job is to police the world.
3. Everybody knows that Republicans are better at policing the world than Democrats.
When I talk about Democrats, I'm not talking about John Kerry. I'm not talking about Ted Kennedy. I don't care about politicians. They all get bought and sold by major corporations, and they're only loyal to whoever is going to get them into office, and pay for their campaigning, legally or not. Clearly there are exceptions. Don't take issue with this, because all it will accomplish is getting this thread off topic. When I talk about Democrats, I'm talking about people that wear sandals and tiedied shirts, have dreadlocks (no offense Come, but you know it's true), enjoy recreational drugs on a regular basis, rarely shower, listen to the Greatful Dead, and throw paint on you if you're wearing a fur coat. Or alternatively, those people that drink ten dollar coffee in bookstores while eating muffins, downloading jazz fusion onto their ipods, and have bumper stickers on their Honda Civic hybrid that say, "Free Tibet" or "Imagine World Peace" or, "My priest raped your honor student".
And these people's views don't make sense. Obviously, the Democratic Party, and Ted Kennedy, and all those other politicians, have some redeeming qualities. But those aren't the people that I have issues with. Except for when Ted Kennedy decides to do some more offshore drilling.
|
|
